Hey y’all. This is my final (ooo)shebop blog. I’ve fallen in love with someone else. And his name is Posterous.
So I’ve transfered all my blogs from here to my new address: http://amandamoutinho.posterous.com/
I hope you guys check it out!
“Let your indulgence set me free.” Those were the last words Shakespeare ever wrote.
We don’t know as much as Shakespeare as we’d like to know. But I feel the last monologue of the Tempest can give insight into the man himself, because Prospero’s words seem they could easily apply to the playwright himself.
To indulge means to satisfy to yield to the wishes of one. This line seems like Shakespeare asking the audience to listen to him. This is his final play and he’d like the audience to pay attention to him one last time before he can be free. Maybe Shakespeare felt like his play writing was an enslavement. As far as we know, we have no proof of the reason Shakepeare wrote his masterpieces. He died roughly six years after the Tempest was written at the ripe age of 52. What was he doing in those years that he wasn’t writing? Was he free to do as he wished? Did he not wish to write anymore?
“Now my spells are all broken,” the first line of monologue. Maybe Shakespeare thinks he has nothing left to offer. With the Tempest, he seemed to go out with a bang. It had romance, comedy, tragedy, politics… everything rolled into one. It’s as if Shakespeare was saying, “Here’s all I got. Now leave me alone!”
The last monologue of the play opens up so many questions to me. Did people pressure Shakespeare to write? Did he feel trapped? In the first few lines he says that he is weak and he begs to be released. He even talks about God and alludes to death as alternate option.
While I don’t know if this speech had anything to do with Shakespeare’s true feelings, I hope he didn’t feel like a slave. He wrote some of the most amazing words ever written. He will always be my favorite author, and my hero till I die.
Was Inception based on Othello…?
No probably not. But there are some parallels in Othello that reminded me of Inception.
The entire point of inception is to plant an idea in someone’s head. Something simple. That will grow into something that will cause the person to act. And what happens in Othello? Iago places a small trinket of an idea in Othello’s mind and Othello ends up loosing control. He becomes so involved in this idea that he kills his wife.
In act 3 scene 3 is when the idea gets planted. Desdemona pleads with Othello on Cassio’s behalf, before this moment Othello has no reason to believe anything is going on. When Iago first suggests there’s something going on, Othello resists at first. Iago asks penetrating questions, hesitates, and acts like he knows something he shouldn’t. By the end of the scene Othello already starts to doubt and get angry with no proof. “I will chop her into messes,” (3.3.201).Why does he jump to conclusions so quickly? His suspicion rises from just one conversation with Iago. This suggests his relationship with Desdemona doesn’t seem to be rooted in very much trust. But it’s funny how it’s just a simple conversation, a simple idea grows into drastic action. (Maybe the opposite of Hamlet.)
In act 4 scene 2 Desdemona is pleading with Othello, and he’s not listening to her. He has become so intranced in this one idea that he doesn’t even find out the truth. Once you have your mind set then everything that happens will play into your mind. The whole handkerchief problem could have been avoided if Othello had kept his cool head and just asked Desdemona what happened. But since this idea grew into something larger he felt he had the whole story when he didn’t have any of it.
So how powerful is one idea. Just an inkling destroyed Othello’s life. That is why I wanted to write this blog. It’s interesting that just an idea can lead to something bigger, which was the reason I thought of Inception.
I’ve read this play before and anytime I go back to a play I’ve read I always have many passages highlighted. Well I didn’t even make it through the first line of the first scene of the first act without running into something I like.
“If music be the food of love, play on/ Give me excess of it, that, surfeiting,/ the appetite may sicken and so die. “
(Act 1, Scene 1, Line 1-2) At the time I read this, I was lovesick and I related to Orsino. In his first speech he immediately becomes a character to relate to. We all have been so in love with someone that we just wallow in our own self pity and love sickness.
Love is one of the most prominent themes Shakespeare. Here he talks about its restlessness. One minute you love something and next minute you don’t. Considering the rest of the play, I don’t really know what Shakespeare is getting at. The character of Orsino really reminds me of Romeo. Romeo beings the play in love with Rosaline and then really finds his true love when he meets Juliet. Same with Orsino, at the end of the play he falls in love with Viola, despite pining over Olivia. Many people believe that makes these characters wishy washy but I believe it makes them human. Often when people are in love, they think about nothing but the other person. But the only way to get over one person is to fall in love with someone else. I believe it’s hopeful.
“Away before me to sweet beds of flowers. Love thoughts lie rich when canopied with bowers,” (Act 1, scene 1).
So go somewhere beautiful and think about love. And when you’re down because the person you love doesn’t love you back, just think that maybe soon you’ll meet your true love.
Continued from last blog:
Ophelia insanitary seems to be rooted in Hamlet. When she comes into Act 4 Scene 5 she’s singing a song that symbolizes her current situation.
“‘Before you tumbled me,
You promised me to wed.’
He answers,
‘So would I ‘a done…
And thou hadst not come to my bed’”
(64- 69). In the song it makes it seem like Ophelia has given up her maidenhood to Hamlet. The girl in the song is distressed because she feels like she was lied to, but the man says he would have kept his promise if the girl hadn’t offered herself to him. So is it that Ophelia is promiscuous or did Hamlet pressure her? It plays into the argument that Ophelia was driven crazy. With my reading of the play I’ve come up with my own theories. I believe Ophelia is portrayed as this innocent fair girl, and Hamlet takes advantage of her. They share a bed, and because bad timing Hamlet [apparently?] goes crazy, and then drags Ophelia down with him.
Part of the reason that it seems Hamlet has gone crazy is because he seems to have had feelings for Ophelia but then completely disregards it.
It’s interesting to think about who is insane? Did Hamlet lose his mind and not care who he brought down with him? Did he cause Ophelia to go crazy? Or in his attempt to achieve his revenge plot did he accidentally cause Ophelia to go crazy? Was it even Hamlet’s fault.
But we’ll never know the answers to all the questions…
It is enough to drive a girl crazy though: you fall in love with this guy. Your family tells you he’s a bad guy. Then he goes insane and goes back on everything he’s said. Kills your dad, then flees. Poor Ophelia.
So maybe she was a dumb girl who let herself get caught up in a self destructive man like Hamlet…
If only Ophelia had a sassy gay friend:
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.